michael_horse

call the plumber, clare!

this has gone on long enough

haha, GUESS WHO THE SELLER IS??

''right... So I said you had no right to SEE the works in question?!??!''

well, yeah.
you said we should wait till the courts and govt decide

that's pretty much approving censorship right there, isn't it ?

666: speaking for myself, you are on the ''same side'' as me, I guess, in that you and I both think people should only judge the photos once they've seen them.

but how can we do that, when the government has decided for us that we can't be allowed to see them?

that process is what people are upset about. the govt deciding we don't have the right to see these photos and judge for ourselves. they're just saying ''trust us, this shit is revolting, go somewhere else''

protest this friday, 5pm

''I'm just saying wouldn't you feel a bit silly if you defended something you haven't seen then when you see it *YOU *decide it is truely fucked? How was that hard to grasp?''

she's not defending the work itself, but defending her right to see the work and judge it

how hard was that to grasp?

666: while i haven't seen the photos in the manner intended (ie: in a gallery, in front of me), i have seen lower resolution versions of them

I think sitting back and waiting, without discussing this is a dangerous game to play

''Well everyone has already gotten in and said stuff.''

yes, on both sides of the argument

your opinion is still welcomed, whether it has been said before or not

''so have ya'll seen the photos yet? Still a completely stupid discussion if not.''

dude, the photos have been confiscated by the police

how are we MEANT to discuss this, except by what we have available?

are you suggesting we all just shut up until the police and courts decide?

when someone's only input to a thread like this is ''stupid boring photos'', then yes, i get the feeling you don't give a shit if they're censored or not