Pitchfork praise for ‘Havilah’ … sorta
News posted Wednesday, March 25 2009 at 12:00 AM.
Related: The Drones.
It’s been more than five months since its Australian release, but The Drones’ Havilah is finally getting some critical attention overseas.
Following a healthy 7/10 in UK hyperbole machine NME last month, where the band were described as jumping “up and down on the rotting carcasses of The Vines and Jet”, US tastemaker Pitchfork has followed suit with a 7.7 (also out of 10).
The online magazine described the album, which ranked in the top five of both M+N’s readers’ and critics’ polls, as “oddly catchy” with songs that “aren't totally dissimilar from the harder-edged moments of bands such as Queens of the Stone Age”. It finished, however, with an odd backhander belying the high-ish rating: “Enduring this album is a bit like making it through a powerful-but-disturbing film. It might make you uncomfortable and you'll probably never watch it again, but you're at least glad you saw it.”
Kinda like that review.
+
Not sure if I understand why this is newsworthy.
cos its weds.
hoorah, one of those random article placing news posts.
M+N, get it together,
Reviewing reviews.......
And promoting Pitchfork.
I feel I understand where that last comment is coming from, actually. I think the Drones are one of the most impressive Australian bands maybe ever, yet I don't often feel like listening to their music - I have to psych myself into it a bit. That's not because I don't think it is excellent music, but because I feel it makes certain heavier demands of me as a listener than most other music I listen to, and maybe I don't always want to feel the way the music makes me feel, or don't feel up to it.
So, yeah.
Next: Pitchfork review of this review of a pitchfork review, all explained by a real yet 'False' wikipedia page.....
I'mout.
So what does this review of a review give the review out of 10 then?
blake3030 said 3 minutes ago:
Not sure if I understand why this is newsworthy.
You started a thread when the Presets got reviewed on Pitchfork, so I guess this is similarly newsworthy.
Lazy journalism FTW
good comment but, really illuminating.
meta
Oh, they look so dark and mysterious, dressed like waiters.
HEY GUYS I DON'T THINK THIS IS NEWS
IS THIS NEWS WORTHY
ps, a hyperbola machine would be a graphical calculator! WAAAYY better than NME!
Did my post disappear fopr being too much of smarmy jerk?
Well deserved..
reckon the could get a job at the Supper Club huh?
anything to do with the drones is newsworthy. as a former m+n contributor once put it to me, they're the band that m+n writers love to love.
i should point out that i hate the drones.
It isn't. Someone's opinion is that the opinion of another someone is pretty bad.
In their opinion.
is everyone having a stupid day or something?
M&N - a website about Australian music.
Local Oz band The Drones - attracting the attention of hugely influential international media organs whose opinions have a massive impact on success of bands
= newsworthy
Pretty obvious, I think.
The Line Of Best Fit UK
...The bargin (sic) basement Bukowski lyrics don’t quite support the elongated songs or the hushed reverance (sic) they seem to recieve in some quaters (sic). 62%
I was young and stupid.
'newsworthy' is perhaps stretching, but it's because it's an Australian music website, and it's about an Australian band that lots of people around these parts love (myself included), and therefore many people are interested in what Pitchfork et al think of the album. However much they say they don't give a fuck.
The fans (like myself) are happy for them (and proud of them).
The haters are as perplexed as ever by their (relative) success.
And everyone is secretly jealous/envious.
So M&N writes about it.
Simple.
I like The Drones. Slow news day I guess.